-
The current policy for
closing small schools is purely based on educational reasons. The
new policy is a significant deviation in that closures will be based
purely on financial reasons.
-
No cash projections are
available to the public and it is not clear how school closure will
achieve any significant financial savings.
-
Other
counties must find themselves in a similar situation, what research
has been done to find alternative solutions?
-
According to government statistics the birth rate (and indeed the
fertility rate) has risen steadily for the last 30 years. There was
a small blip in 2001 and admissions for 2007/8 have reflected this.
There is no evidence to suggest there will be fewer pupils in
primary education than there were 30 years ago. Wholesale school
closures based on projections 3-5 years ahead is short sighted in
the extreme.
-
What is the likely outcome
of the Comprehensive Spending Review? Are there any proposals to
change the funding methodology? What can central government do to
help?
-
There
is no evidence to suggest that in small schools:
head teacher recruitment is a problem because of multi age classes.
teaching staff struggle to meet the breadth of curriculum delivery for a
range of year groups in a single class – in fact staff find little
difference than teaching a same age group of mixed ability pupils.
small schools are vulnerable in terms of performance when staff
absence or turnover occurs
-
What other ways of cost
cutting have been explored? For example proposals for groups of
small schools sharing a head teacher would seem a sensible
alternative; alternatively reductions in LEA staff.
-
Ofsted
reports consistently praise the high standards of both education and
social skills in small schools, Shropshire should be proud and
encouraging, not dismissive and repressive.
-
Pupils
thrive in the small school family environment, often their
achievements far exceed the expectations, they mature into healthy,
well rounded, confident individuals who are ready to enter the next
stage of their education.
-
Surplus places are simply a statistic which can be changed simply by
altering the ‘standard number’ in each school and should not be used
as criteria for a school closure policy.
-
Countryside Commission (CC)
“State of the Countryside 2005” revealed the best results in English
education were coming from schools with 100 pupils or less on roll
and that generally across the age spectrum through to 16+ pupils
living in rural areas did better.
-
A CC 2006 report shows that
if current urban to rural migration continues the most rural areas
will see the greatest growth in population. Present Office of
National Statistics projections suggest most rural areas will grow
by almost 20% by 2028.
-
DEFRA
sees rural schools as central to the concern for rural stability.
Young families are central to issues such as housing, employment,
transport and the environment